I know we’re quickly advancing in technology but there’s something wrong in this scenario. A friend of mine received this text message. Anong mali dito?!
“(Bank name here) bank plantiff vs (Friend’s name here), criminal case number 03-886-08 preliminary attachment of property you are being summoned to appear in Makati RTC Branch 137 under judge Benjamin Goson for violating d RA 8484 and article 315 Large Scale estafa of d revised penal code. warrant of arrest will be serve by sheriff Mark Escobar and SPO1 santos for more question pls. col ATty. Peralta at 8561833 loc 231”
- Shouldn’t “criminal case” documents be filed in paper and not thru TEXT MESSAGE for formality and documentary purposes?
- Shouldn’t “criminal case” starts with “People of the Phils. vs. (PERSON)”?
- Criminal case for what? Not paying debts? Wala naman atang patayang naganap.
- Warrant of Arrest notice given ahead of time? Then shouldn’t my friend start to hide?
- RA8484? I wasn’t aware that she FALSIFIED her CC details (which I am sure she DIDN’T)
- "JUDGE" Benjamin Goson is not on the list of Makati RTC Branch 137’s presiding judge. Actually, Walang GOSON sa list! So saan siya nanggaling? See my additional “Reads” section below. Tsk-tsk..
- She was TOLD that a case was filed. So, what’s the use of calling anyone? Just meet in court.
- And you know what? I KNOW a number of people who received the very SAME (exact format, grammar, sentence construction, etc.) text message.
- 8561833 - CA's number. Ay… Alam na!
If you are unaware of lies and harassments made by some CAs you’d end up quivering in fear. Know your rights! You are a DEFAULTER and NOT a criminal. Come to think of it, criminals weren’t even harassed and given time to defend themselves when they are arrested/being arrested, so why should you be (since you’re not a criminal?)
Reads:
http://failuretopaycreditcard.blogspot.com/2009/06/ra-8484-simplified.html
http://www.lawphil.net/courts/mrtc/mrtc_dir.html#makati
No comments:
Post a Comment